United States of America, Plaintiff Appellee, v. Eddie Lee Gist, Defendant Appellant, 21 F.3d 425 (4th Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-89-168-C, CA-93-282-R)
Eddie Lee Gist, appellant pro se.
Joseph William Hooge Mott, Asst. U.S. Atty., Roanoke, VA, for appellee.
W.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Gist, Nos. CR-89-168-C; CA-93-282-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 28, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Because the motions, files, and record conclusively showed that Gist was not entitled to relief, the district court did not err in denying an evidentiary hearing. Fontaine v. United States, 411 U.S. 213, 215 (1973)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
