United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Michael D. Wright, Defendant-appellant, 21 F.3d 1123 (10th Cir. 1994)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit - 21 F.3d 1123 (10th Cir. 1994) March 31, 1994

Before LOGAN, McKAY, and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT1 

This is an appeal from the grant of summary judgment in favor of the United States for money due on a promissory note. The trial court rejected the series of defenses raised by Defendant. Our review of the briefs and record, together with the benefit of oral argument, persuades us that the trial court was correct. We therefore affirm the court's order and judgment filed January 25, 1993, for the reasons given by the trial court in its written ruling filed January 4, 1993.

AFFIRMED.

 1

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of the court's General Order filed November 29, 1993. 151 F.R.D. 470

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.