Daniel v. Kelley, Plaintiff-appellant, v. County of Imperial, et al., Defendants-appellees, 21 F.3d 1113 (9th Cir. 1994)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 21 F.3d 1113 (9th Cir. 1994) Submitted March 9, 1994. *Decided March 21, 1994

Before: PREGERSON, O'SCANNLAIN, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

Daniel Kelley appeals the district court's dismissal of his civil rights action against the County of Imperial and various county and federal officials who were associated with his arrest and conviction on simple assault charges.

We have carefully reviewed the record and the district court's decision, and we affirm the dismissals for the reasons set forth in the district court's detailed oral ruling from the bench on July 31, 1992, as referred to and incorporated in its order filed on August 5, 1992.

Kelley also asserts that there was error in the granting of a temporary stay of discovery. The district court stayed discovery between the time of a motion for a more definite statement on May 7, 1992, and the filing of Kelley's amended complaint on July 8, 1992. We see no impropriety or error in the granting of that stay.

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to 9th Cir.R. 34-4 and Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.