Robert Allen Williams, Jr., Petitioner-appellee, v. Pamela Withrow, Respondent-appellant, 2 F.3d 1152 (6th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseBefore: JONES and RYAN, Circuit Judges; and PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.
ORDER ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
The United States Supreme Court has affirmed this court's decision that the district court appropriately exercised collateral review in this case. Withrow v. Williams, No. 91-1030, slip op. at 4-14 (U.S. April 21, 1993). Therefore, it remains decided that the district court properly determined that petitioner's statements during his April 10 interrogation must be suppressed. See Williams v. Withrow, 944 F.2d 284, 288-90 (6th Cir. 1991).
The Court reversed our determination that the district court properly determined that petitioner's statements made after the April 10 interrogation must be suppressed. See Slip op. at 14-15; 944 F.2d at 290.
Accordingly, we remand to allow the district court to act on its grant of the petitioner's writ of habeas corpus with a retrial order to the State of Michigan that is consistent with the opinions of this court and the Supreme Court.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
