Darwin Rusty Siers, Plaintiff Appellant, v. Stephen F. Greiner, Sheriff; Shayne Yearego, Correctionalofficer; James E. Asbury, Correctional Officer;co Joy; Co Mcmullen; Defts; Beulah I.siers, Defendants Appellees,glenda L. Hedrick, Party in Interest Appellee.darwin Rusty Siers, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Stephen F. Greiner, Sheriff; Shayne Yearego, Correctionalofficer; James E. Asbury, Correctional Officer;co Joy; Co Mcmullen; Defts; Beulah I.siers, Defendants Appellees,glenda L. Hedrick, Party in Interest Appellee, 16 F.3d 411 (4th Cir. 1994)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 16 F.3d 411 (4th Cir. 1994) Submitted Dec. 16, 1993. Decided Jan. 14, 1994

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Charles H. Haden, II, Chief District Judge.

Darwin Rusty Siers, appellant Pro Se.

J. Michael Weber, Sarah Ruth Simon, Bowles, Rice, McDavid, Graff & Love, Jeffrey Brent Reed, Pros. Atty. for Wood County, Parkersburg, WV; Beulah I. Siers, Williamstown, WV; William Berkley Richardson, Jr., Richardson & Richardson, Parkersburg, WV, for appellees.

S.D.W. Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders (1) granting intervenors' requests for enforcement of prior judgments and allowing costs for Siers's guardian ad litem (No. 93-7056) and (2) denying reconsideration pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60. (No. 93-7092). Our review of the record and the district court's opinions and the magistrate judge's recommendation discloses that this appeal is without merit.*  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Siers v. Greiner, No. CA-89-960-6 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 26; Sept. 23, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

 *

We deny the motion to dismiss of Appellees Greiner, Yearego, Asbury, Joy and McMullen

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.