United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Freeman Anthony Farley, Defendant-appellant, 14 F.3d 602 (6th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseBefore: KENNEDY, NORRIS, Circuit Judges; and KRUPANSKY, Senior Circuit Judge.
ORDER
One of the issues raised in this appeal is the refusal of the District Court to consider whether certain of defendant's prior convictions are constitutionally valid. Our recent en banc decision in United States v. McGlocklin, No. 91-6121, --- F.3d ----, 1993 WL 356406 (6th Cir., Sept. 17, 1993) (en banc) requires that issue be addressed. We vacate the judgment and remand that issue to the District Court for consideration in light of McGlocklin.1
Accordingly, it is so ORDERED.
On October 12, 1993, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in the case of Custis v. United States, 988 F.2d 1355 (4th Cir. 1993), cert. granted 62 U.S.L.W. 3272, No. 93-5209 (Oct. 12, 1993), an opinion relied upon by the plurality in McGlocklin
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
