Jack Ray Vigue, Plaintiff-appellant, v. L.r. Ross; C.d. Young; W.l. Panley; L.w. Cox; Carlpennington; Lynda Burnett; Rod Telsch; Richarda. Young; Louis B. Cei, Doctor;patrick Gurnell; Allyn R.seilaff, Defendants-appellees, 14 F.3d 598 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon.SSAT1Jack Ray Vigue, appellant pro se.
Karen Lynn Lebo, for appellees.
W.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Appellant appeals from the district court's order that dismissed his "Motion to Comply" in regard to a 1985 consent order. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Vigue v. Ross, No. CA-85-85-A (W.D. Va. June 9, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
