United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Marion William Dodson, Jr., Defendant-appellant, 14 F.3d 597 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Marion William Dodson, Jr., appellant pro se.
Christine Fay Wright, Office of the United States Attorney, for Appellee.
E.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for specific enforcement of the paragraph in his plea agreement providing that the government reserved the right to move for a substantial assistance departure at or after sentencing, pursuant to sentencing guideline section 5K1.1* or Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b), if it found that such a motion was warranted. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Dodson, No. CR-91-111-A (E.D. Va. July 17, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual, Sec. 5K1.1 (Nov.1992)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
