Joanne M. Weston, Debtor-appellant, v. William L. Conway, Trustee; Bryon Lee Lynch, Appellees, 134 F.3d 381 (9th Cir. 1998)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 134 F.3d 381 (9th Cir. 1998) Submitted January 12, 1998**Jan. 16, 1998

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, No. EC-94-01235-VRH; Volinn, Russell, and Hagan, Judges, Presiding.

Before: BROWNING, KLEINFELD, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM* 

JoAnne Weston appeals pro se a decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel ("BAP") affirming bankruptcy court orders that: (1) denied Weston's motion to remove the trustee of her Chapter 7 bankruptcy estate and the trustee's counsel, (2) denied the trustee's counsel's final fee application, and (3) directed partial disgorgement of fees paid out under the trustee's counsel's interim fee application. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d), and we affirm.

We review decisions of the BAP de novo. See Apte v. Japra (In re Apte), 96 F.3d 1319, 1322 (9th Cir. 1996). On appeal from the BAP, we review the bankruptcy court's rulings independently. See id. The bankruptcy court's findings of fact are reviewed for clear error and its conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Neben & Starrett, Inc. v. Chartwell Fin. Corp. ( In re Park-Helena Corp.), 63 F.3d 877, 880 (9th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 712 (1996). The bankruptcy court's decision regarding the proper amount of legal fees to be awarded is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. See id.

We affirm the decision of the BAP for the reasons set out in the BAP's memorandum decision filed on August 13, 1996.

AFFIRMED.

 **

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

 *

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.