Samuel Brown, Petitioner-appellant, v. William A. Perrill, Respondent-appellee, 131 F.3d 151 (10th Cir. 1997)Annotate this Case
Nov. 26, 1997
ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, PORFILIO and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
We hold the district court did not err in dismissing without prejudice appellant's habeas corpus petition. We AFFIRM for the reasons stated by the district court in its order adopting the findings and recommendations of the magistrate judge. The motion to proceed without prepayment of fees is GRANTED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3