United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Marino Camacho-cibrian, Defendant-appellant, 131 F.3d 149 (9th Cir. 1997)Annotate this Case
Submitted November 17, 1997. **Filed Nov. 21, 1997
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, D.C. Nos. CV-97-06044-MRH, CR-95-60062-MRH; Michael R. Hogan, Chief Judge, Presiding.
Before HUG, Chief Judge, PREGERSON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.
Marino Camacho-Cibrian appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order filed July 2, 1997. We agree with the district court that Damacho-Cibrian's waiver of the right to file a section 2255 motion is valid.1
The panel unaminously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3
Camacho-Cibrian's request for oral argument and motion for appointment of cousnel are denied