Lonnie-scott Holden, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Larry D. Holden, Defendant-appellee, 127 F.3d 1109 (10th Cir. 1997)
Annotate this CaseBefore BALDOCK, McKAY, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Defendant-Appellee has filed a motion to strike Plaintiff-Appellant's Reply Brief, and Plaintiff-Appellant has filed a response to this motion. The Motion to Strike is hereby DENIED.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed for the reasons given in its Memorandum and Order filed February 12, 1997.
AFFIRMED.
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
