United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Rogelio Lopez-soto, Defendant-appellant, 124 F.3d 214 (9th Cir. 1997)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 124 F.3d 214 (9th Cir. 1997) Submitted Sept. 8, 1997. **Decided Sept. 12, 1997

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, No. CR-95-00091-6-HJF; Helen J. Frye, District Judge, Presiding.

Before: HALL, BRUNETTI, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM* 

Rogelio Lopez-Soto appeals his sentence for his guilty plea conviction to distribution of cocaine and unlawful entry in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) (1) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) (1). Lopez's counsel has submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Because our review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no meritorious issues for review, we AFFIRM the district court's judgment and GRANT the motion of counsel to withdraw.

 **

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

 *

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.