Roger L. Setliff, Jr., Plaintiff-appellant, v. David v. Williams; Robert Bushnell; Wayne Baucino,defendants-appellees, 12 F.3d 205 (4th Cir. 1993)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 12 F.3d 205 (4th Cir. 1993)

Submitted Oct. 25, 1993. Decided Nov. 19, 1993


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke, No. CA-93-662-R; James C. Turk, District Judge.

Roger L. Setliff, Jr., pro se.

W.D. Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Setliff v. Williams, No. CA-93-662-R (W.D. Va. Sept. 9, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.