George Alvin Cantrell, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Beverly Jones, Defendant-appellee, 12 F.3d 204 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence.
George Alvin Cantrell, Appelant Pro Se.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
George Alvin Cantrell appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Cantrell v. Jones, No. CA-92-3361-4-21AK (D.S.C. Nov. 25, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
We express no opinion on the merits of Cantrell's state law claims. See S.C.Code Ann. Sec. 44-29-135 (1991 Supp.)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
