William F. Nagle, Plaintiff-appellant, Cross-appellee, v. Comedy Northwest, Inc., Defendant-appellee, Cross-appellant, 113 F.3d 1242 (9th Cir. 1997)
Annotate this CaseBefore: WRIGHT, REINHARDT and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
ORDER**
The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons given in the court's Memorandum of Decision and Order filed August 25, 1994. The Motion to Strike Appellant's Reply Brief is granted, and the request for sanctions is denied.
AFFIRMED.
Counsel for the appellant, Paul H. King, made a belated request to waive oral argument on the date set and did not comply with Ninth Circuit Rule 34(f). His failure to appear in Court was a disservice to his client and an imposition on opposing counsel
Although counsel did not comply with Ninth Circuit Rule 34(f), the panel unanimously found this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
