Carl Anders Eckstrom, Petitioner-appellant, v. Allan A. Stagner, Superintendent; Attorney General of Thestate of California, Respondents-appellees, 113 F.3d 1240 (9th Cir. 1997)
Annotate this CaseBefore: MAGILL,** RYMER and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM***
Carl Anders Eckstrom appeals the district court's decision to deny his petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for habeas corpus relief. Eckstrom's attorney has filed a motion to withdraw and submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that there are no meritorious issues upon which to appeal. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82-83 (1988), discloses no issues for review. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's decision to deny Eckstrom's petition and grant counsel's motion to withdraw.
* * *
AFFIRMED.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a) and Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4
The Honorable Frank Magill, Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
