United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Alfredo Camacho-nuno, Defendant-appellant, 112 F.3d 517 (9th Cir. 1997)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 112 F.3d 517 (9th Cir. 1997) Submitted April 21, 1997. *Decided April 24, 1997

Before BROWNING, THOMPSON and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM** 

Alfredo Camacho-Nuno appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his conviction for using and carrying a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (1). He contends that his conviction should be vacated because he did not personally "use" a firearm as defined in Bailey v. United States, 116 S. Ct. 501 (1995), and he cannot be held responsible for the acts of codefendant Jose Gonzales-Amescua. We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order filed May 10, 1996. See United States v. Lopez, 100 F.3d 98, 101 (9th Cir. 1996).

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3