Richard Curry, Plaintiff-appellant, v. James Gomez, Director, California Corrections Department, Etal., Defendant,andjohn Ratelle, Warden; Bobbie Reed, Associate Warden,richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility; Robert Duggan,production Manager; N. Gomez; B. Garibay, in Her Officialcapacity; D. Beard, Lieutenant, Correctional, Defendants-appellees, 107 F.3d 15 (9th Cir. 1997)
Annotate this CaseBefore: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
California state prisoner Richard Curry appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment dismissal and denial of reconsideration of the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging his constitutional rights were violated by prison authorities who failed to follow state regulations and denied Curry due process during prison disciplinary proceedings. We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its Orders filed on January 3, 1996 and April 16, 1996.
AFFIRMED.1
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3
Because of our disposition of this appeal, we do not consider the applicability, if any, of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996), to this appeal
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
