Steven L. Edwards, Appellant, v. Janet Reno, United States Attorney General and Thomas J.fitzpatrick, Chief, Civil Rights Unit, Criminalinvestigative Division, Appellees, 106 F.3d 442 (D.C. Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 106 F.3d 442 (D.C. Cir. 1996) Dec. 11, 1996

Before SILBERMAN, RANDOLPH, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.


This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 36(b). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's order filed April 11, 1994 be affirmed. The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). Appellant claims the failure to investigate his civil rights claim violates a legal interest. This alleged legal interest in an investigation is "one that clearly does not exist." Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327 (1989). An individual may not sue to compel officials at the Justice Department to initiate an investigation concerning the alleged criminal acts of another. See Linda R.S. v. Richard D., 410 U.S. 614, 619 (1973).

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.