Arthur H. Keels, Plaintiff-appellant, v. State of South Carolina; William T. Howell, Honorable;george T. Gregory, Chief Justice; David W. Harwell,associate Justice; A. Lee Chandler, Associate Justice;ernest A. Finney, Jr., Associate Justice; Jean Toal,associate Justice; John E. Waites; Michael S. Church;funderburk & Derrick, Attorneys; James W. Alford, Attorney,defendants-appellees, 1 F.3d 1233 (4th Cir. 1993)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 1 F.3d 1233 (4th Cir. 1993) Submitted: July 16, 1993. Decided: August 2, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-91-1570-3-17-B)

Arthur H. Keels, Appellant Pro Se.

Edwin Eugene Evans, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina; Michael Stephen Church, Turner, Padget, Graham & Laney, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina; James Warner Alford, R. Lewis Johnson, Barnes, Alford, Stork & Johnson, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


OPINION

Arthur H. Keels appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Keels v. South Carolina, No. CA-91-1570-3-17-B (D.S.C. Mar. 19, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED