United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Jose Ignacio Herrera, A/k/a Joey Herrera, Defendant-appellant, 993 F.2d 229 (4th Cir. 1993)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 993 F.2d 229 (4th Cir. 1993) Submitted: March 29, 1993Decided: April 27, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Franklin T. Dupree, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-86-2)

Jose Ignacio Herrera, Appellant Pro Se.

Eileen G. Coffey, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before LUTTIG, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Jose Ignacio Herrera appeals from the district court's order denying mandamus relief. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Herrera, No. CR-86-2 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 17, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.