Greta v. Gordon, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Mark Catza; Broughton Hospital, Defendants-appellees, 993 F.2d 1536 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Shelby. Richard L. Voorhees, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-37-4)
Greta V. Gordon, Appellant Pro Se.
W.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL and HALL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Greta V. Gordon appeals from the district court's order dismissing this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) action as frivolous, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses no abuse of discretion and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gordon v. Catza, No. CA-93-37-4 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 24, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
