Robert H. Ketchum, a Pseudonym for Kent C. Norman, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Richard R. Thornburgh, Attorney General of the Unitedstates; United States Department of Justice,defendants-appellees, 992 F.2d 1223 (10th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseBefore SEYMOUR, ANDERSON, and EBEL, Circuit Judges.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Robert H. Ketchum (a pseudonym for Kent C. Norman) appeals the dismissal of his action brought against the Attorney General of the United States and the Department of Justice.
We have carefully reviewed the file in this case and conclude that, substantially for the reasons stated by the district court in its order of May 21, 1991, Mr. Ketchum's argument on appeal lacks any arguable basis in law. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.
This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
