United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Jackie Donnell Hollingsworth, Defendant-appellant.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Jackie Donnell Hollingsworth, Defendant-appellant, 991 F.2d 791 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CR-85-8, CA-92-101-3-CIV-B, CR-85-8-3-BR)
Jackie Donnell Hollingsworth, Appellant Pro Se.
Margaret Person Currin, United States Attorney, G. Norman Acker, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, North Carolina, for Appellee.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Jackie Donnell Hollingsworth appeals in Case No. 92-7254 from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) and in Case No. 92-7257 from the district court's order denying his motion for bail pending the disposition of the § 2255 motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hollingsworth, Nos. CR85-8, CA-92-101-3-CIV-B (E.D.N.C. Nov. 23, 1992; Dec. 2, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
