Darlene M. Lucas, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Dick Cheney, Secretary of Defense, Defendant-appellee, 991 F.2d 790 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert F. Murray, Senior District Judge. (CA-92-606)
Darlene M. Lucas, Appellant Pro Se.
James G. Warwick, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, for Appellee.
D. Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before LUTTIG, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Darlene M. Lucas appeals from the district court's order dismissing her employment discrimination complaint brought under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Lucas v. Cheney, No. CA-92606 (D. Md. Oct. 13, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Although Lucas did not receive the notice required by Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975), on this record we find the failure to be harmless error. Fed. R. Civ. P. 61. Additionally, we find no error in the denial of the motion for appointment of counsel as moot
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
