United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Jeffrey Visger, Defendant-appellant, 988 F.2d 126 (9th Cir. 1993)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 988 F.2d 126 (9th Cir. 1993) Submitted March 1, 1993. *Decided March 3, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; No. CR-88-0557-KN, David V. Kenyon, District Judge, Presiding.

C.D. Cal.

AFFIRMED.

Before JAMES R. BROWNING, HUG and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

Visger and the postal inspectors who interviewed him gave differing versions of what was said at the interview. In denying the motion to suppress Visger's statements, the district judge necessarily credited the testimony of the postal inspectors over that of Visger. See United States v. Coletta, 682 F.2d 820, 825 (9th Cir. 1982). Based on the inspectors' version of the interview, denial of the motion to suppress was proper.

AFFIRMED

 *

The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to 9th Cir.R. 34-4 and Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or for the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.