United States of America for Use of Goodrich Roofingcompany, Plaintiff, Counter-defendant, Appellant, v. Mandan, Inc. and Transamerica Insurance Company, Defendants,counter-claimants, Appellees, 986 F.2d 1431 (10th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseBefore McKAY, Chief Judge, and SETH and BARRETT, Circuit Judges.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
SETH, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
The record and briefs in this appeal demonstrate that both parties are asserting that a settlement agreement of the basic dispute upon which the litigation was based is valid.
There is no issue remaining in the appeal except the claims for attorney fees and costs.
The appeal is DISMISSED, and the case is REMANDED to the United States District Court for New Mexico for the disposition of the claim for fees and costs and for whatever other action which the court considers necessary.
IT IS SO ORDERED. The mandate will issue forthwith.
This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
