Jack Ray Vigue, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Fred W. Greene; John E. Lightfoot; Edward L. Vasser; Drewthompson; Eugene Johnson; Julie Bonds; Louis B. Cei,doctor; Copeland, Nurse; Robert M. Landon, Director; Terryc. Richtmyer; Ed Foley; C. A. Neff; Lieutenant Gochenour;sergeant Frazier; Corporal White; C/o Blackwell; Robertspann; T. J. Towberman; E. Joe Waters; Patrick Gurney;james Sisk; J. P. Mitchell; Sherman L. Townley; W. A.crenshaw; Herbert Bryant; Dave K. Smith; J. R. Killeen;dorothy Farrar; L. Icenhour; Corporal Smith; P. C.burwell; H. Coles; Larry Hawkins; Dr. Gulmatico; J. J.hayes; Corporal Robertson; Hanks, Correctional Officer,defendants-appellees, 983 F.2d 1059 (4th Cir. 1992)

OPINION

Jack Vigue, a Virginia inmate, appeals the magistrate judge's order denying his motions to enforce a settlement agreement in Vigue's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) action.^*  Our review of the record discloses that the magistrate judge did not abuse his discretion and this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Vigue v. Greene, Nos. CA-84-208-R, CA-84-239, CA-84546 (E.D. Va. Aug. 14, 1992). However, we modify the magistrate judge's order to dismiss without prejudice those claims the magistrate judge refused to review and identified as allegations of retaliatory transfers, placement of false information in plaintiff's files, failure to investigate, and failure to protect. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED