United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Tyrone Peter Darks, Defendant-appellant, 980 F.2d 741 (10th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseBefore STEPHEN H. ANDERSON and BRORBY, Circuit Judges, and BRATTON,* District Judge.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT**
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
Tyrone Peter Darks appeals the revocation of his supervised release arguing that the district court erred as a matter of law by revoking his supervised release based upon pending state charges without sufficient reliable evidence, and without stating in its order the evidence relied upon to find a violation.
We have carefully reviewed the matter, including the arguments of the parties, and conclude that no reversible error occurred in the proceedings below. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.
The Honorable Howard C. Bratton, Senior Judge, United States District Court for the District of New Mexico, sitting by designation
This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3
The court has granted appellant's unopposed motion to submit this case on the briefs, and this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
