United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Ramon Elesvan Dorta, A/k/a Raymond Dorchester, Defendant-appellant, 980 F.2d 728 (4th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Richard C. Erwin, Senior District Judge.
Ramon Elesvan Dorta, Appellant Pro Se.
David Bernard Smith, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
M.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Ramon Elesvan Dorta appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Dorta, Nos. CR-84-31-G, CA-91-428-2 (M.D.N.C. July 14, 1992). We deny Dorta's motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
