Charles M. Looney, Petitioner, v. Bounty Mining Corporation; Director, Office of Workers'compensation Programs, United States Department Oflabor, Respondents, 980 F.2d 727 (4th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 980 F.2d 727 (4th Cir. 1992) Submitted: September 11, 1992Decided: December 11, 1992

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (90-0644-BLA)

Charles M. Looney, Petitioner Pro Se.

Monroe Jamison, Jr., Penn, Stuart, Eskridge & Jones, Abingdon, Virginia; Michael John Denney, Elizabeth Lopes, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.

Ben.Rev.Bd.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


OPINION

Charles M. Looney seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. # 8E8E # 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1992). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Looney v. Bounty Mining Corp., No. 90-0644-BLA (B.R.B. Mar. 25, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED