Roger Lee Mckoy, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Robert Joyers, Defendant-appellee, 979 F.2d 848 (4th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Roger Lee McKoy, Appellant Pro Se.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Roger Lee McKoy appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) and his motion for reconsideration. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit and that there was no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McKoy v. Joyers, No. CA-92-360-CRT-F (E.D.N.C. June 10 and 22, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
