Peter Emmanuel Bernard, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Clarence L. Jackson, Jr.; C. Hill, Defendants-appellees, 979 F.2d 847 (4th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 979 F.2d 847 (4th Cir. 1992) Submitted: September 28, 1992Decided: October 28, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-92-233-R)

Peter Emmanuel Bernard, Appellant Pro Se.

Reneen Evat Hewlett, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

W.D. Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


OPINION

Peter Emmanuel Bernard appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bernard v. Jackson, No. CA-92-233-R (W.D. Va. July 13, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.