Gregory Michael Stone, Appellant, v. Defense Investigative Services, et al, 978 F.2d 744 (D.C. Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 978 F.2d 744 (D.C. Cir. 1992) Sept. 23, 1992

Before BUCKLEY, SENTELLE and KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.


Upon consideration of appellant's motion for expedition and the opposition thereto; appellee's motion for summary affirmance and the opposition thereto; and the motion for hearing of appeal on original record and the opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance be granted substantially for the reason stated by the district court in its Order filed February 24, 1992. The merits of the parties' positions are so clear as to justify summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (per curiam); Walker v. Washington, 627 F.2d 541, 545 (D.C. Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 994 (1980). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the remaining motions be dismissed as moot.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.