United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Gary Holland, Defendant-appellant, 978 F.2d 1256 (4th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert F. Murray, Senior District Judge. (CR-90-149-HM)
Gary Holland, Appellant Pro Se.
Richard Charles Kay, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
D. Md.
Affirmed.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Gary Holland appeals from the district court's order denying Holland's motions pursuant to Rules 32 and 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Holland, No. CR-90-149-HM (D. Md. July 20, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.*
AFFIRMED
Thus, Holland's request for oral argument is denied
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
