Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.united States, Appellee, v. Amparo Toro-aristizabal, Defendant, Appellant, 978 F.2d 1253 (1st Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseAPPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Amparo Toro-Aristizabal on brief pro se.
A. John Pappalardo, United States Attorney, and Stephen P. Heymann, Assistant United States Attorney, on Motion for Summary Disposition for appellee.
Before Breyer, Chief Judge, Torruella and Cyr, Circuit Judges,
Per Curiam.
On this consolidated appeal, we summarily affirm the district court's denial of appellant's "Motion for Stay of Judgment" as moot. We also affirm the district court's denial of appellant's "Motion to Correct Judgment and Commitment Order Restitution on Count Three of the Indictment," which was improperly brought under Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a). This affirmance is without prejudice to any rights appellant may have to pursue a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, should she contend that relief is properly available to her under that statute.
So ordered.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
