Dibissa Tolessa, Appellant, v. Mary Davis, et al, 976 F.2d 47 (D.C. Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 976 F.2d 47 (D.C. Cir. 1992) Aug. 3, 1992. Rehearing Denied Sept. 23, 1992

Before WALD, SILBERMAN and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.


Upon consideration of the court's order to show cause and appellant's responses thereto, it is

ORDERED that the court's order to show cause, filed November 22, 1991, be discharged. It is

FURTHER ORDERED, on the court's own motion, that the appeal be dismissed as untimely. Appellant filed a notice of appeal well over sixty days after entry of the order appealed from. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) (1). Thus, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. See Browder v. Director, Illinois Department of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978).

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.