Charles Sonny Bostic, Petitioner-appellant, v. State Judicial Officials; Attorney General of Northcarolina, Lacy H. Thornburg, Respondents-appellees, 974 F.2d 1330 (4th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseCharles Sonny Bostic, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before RUSSELL, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Charles Sonny Bostic appeals from the district court's order which construed his motion entitled "Supplemental Pleadings" as a motion for reconsideration of the denial of his 28 U.S.C.s 2254 (1988) petition and denied the motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. Bostic v. State Judicial Officials, No. CA-91-561-HC-H (E.D.N.C. Jan. 24, 1992).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
We grant Bostic's motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.