Paris Valentine, Petitioner-appellant, v. Carol P. Getty; United States Attorney, Respondents-appellees, 972 F.2d 344 (4th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey, II, Senior District Judge. (CA-92-1256-H)
Paris Valentine, Appellant Pro Se.
D. Md.
Affirmed.
Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Paris Valentine, a federal inmate, appeals from the district court's order dismissing for want of jurisdiction his petition challenging the validity of a parole detainer issued by the United States Parole Commission. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Valentine v. Getty, No. CA-92-1256-H (D. Md. May 12, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
