Curtis L. Harris, Petitioner-appellant, v. State of South Carolina; T. Travis Medlock, Attorneygeneral of the State of South Carolina,respondents-appellees, 966 F.2d 1442 (4th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 966 F.2d 1442 (4th Cir. 1992) Submitted: May 13, 1992Decided: June 10, 1992

Curtis L. Harris, Appellant Pro Se.

Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before RUSSELL and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


OPINION

Curtis L. Harris seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Harris v. South Carolina, No. CA-91-2786 (D.S.C. Nov. 1, 1991).*  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

 *

Harris has filed a "Motion for an Ending of the Rigors of ImprisonmentConsideration-En Banc." No poll has been requested on the suggestion for hearing in banc. Harris's motion is considered and denied

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.