Hugh E. Mayo, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Clarence L. Jackson, Jr.; Lewis W. Hurst; John D. Parker;john A. Brown; Gail Y. Browne; Jacqueline F. Fraser;patricia L. Huffman; W. D. Blankenship; Division of Riskmanagement; Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland;magistrate Hall; Ernie Lester; Greg Gibson; Investogatorsuevarey; Virginia Parole Board; Department of Virginiastate Police; County of Bland; Virginia Department Ofcorrections, Defendants-appellees, 962 F.2d 7 (4th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 962 F.2d 7 (4th Cir. 1992) Submitted: April 8, 1992Decided: May 19, 1992

Before RUSSELL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Hugh E. Mayo, Appellant Pro Se.

Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, William Mark Dunn, Assistant Attorney General, Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Bradfute Warwick Davenport, Jr., Mays & Valentine, Richmond, Virginia; Philip Parker, Woods, Rogers & Hazlegrove, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM:


Hugh E. Mayo appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mayo v. Jackson, No. CA-91-415-R (W.D. Va. Jan. 30, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.