Frizell Stephens, Petitioner-appellant, v. Chief of Police for Lynchburg, Virginia; William G. Petty,commonwealth's Attorney for Lynchburg; Edward W. Murray;s. L. Colmore; Charles Watts; R. L. Viar; D. F.mccullock; C. E. Jones; G. Reynolds, Respondents-appellees, 960 F.2d 147 (4th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseFrizell Stephens, Appellant Pro Se. Walter Clyde Erwin, III, Assistant City Attorney, Lynchburg, Virginia; Alexander Wayne Bell, Lynchburg, Virginia; John H. McLees, Jr., Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Frizell Stephens appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Stephens v. Chief of Police, No. CA-90-535-R (W.D. Va. Nov. 21, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.