United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Joseph Ugwunna Udechukwu, Defendant-appellant, 959 F.2d 232 (4th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseJoseph Ugwunna Udechukwu, Appellant Pro Se.
Renee Runcel Christina, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before RUSSELL and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Ugwunna Udechukwu appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for a new trial under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Udechukwu, No. CR-90-310-A (E.D. Va. Aug. 28, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Our affirmance is entered without prejudice to Udechukwu's ability to raise any constitutional claims he may have, including those contained in this Motion for a New Trial, by presenting those claims with specificity to the district court in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) petition
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
