A.c. Processing, Inc. and Randy Ross, Plaintiffs-appellees,cross-appellants, v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., W.s. Tyler Company, & Coalmatetechnologies, Inc., Defendants-appellants, Cross-appellees, 955 F.2d 44 (6th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 955 F.2d 44 (6th Cir. 1992)

Feb. 18, 1992


Before BOGGS and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.


Defendants appeal from the judgment of the district court entered for plaintiffs following a trial to the court. Plaintiffs cross-appeal from a portion of the judgment which they claim improperly limits the amount which they are entitled to recover.

Having had the benefit of oral argument, and having carefully considered the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we are unable to say that the district court erred in granting judgment to plaintiffs or in its computation of the recovery due plaintiffs.

As the reasons why judgment should be entered for plaintiffs and how recovery should be calculated have been articulated by the district court, the issuance of a written opinion by this court would be duplicative and serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed upon the reasoning set out by that court in its findings of fact and conclusions of law dated November 16, 1990.