Charles Bostic, A/k/a Charles Sonny Bostic, Plaintiff-appellant, v. R.v. Stamey; J.b. French; Danny Faircloth; Williamhorton; Carlton Joyner; F.s. Walker, Defendants-appellees, 953 F.2d 1383 (4th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 953 F.2d 1383 (4th Cir. 1992) Submitted Aug. 23, 1991. Decided Feb. 6, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-91-68-MISC)

Charles Sonny Bostic, appellant pro se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:


Charles Sonny Bostic appeals from the district court's order which denied him leave to file his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint because he did not comply with the court's prefiling review order. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.*  Bostic v. Stamey, No. CA-91-68-MISC (E.D.N.C. Apr. 2, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

 *

We also deny Bostic's motions for an injunction pending appeal, for production of documents, and to strike appellees' pleadings and "consolidate defenses."

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.