United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Byron Carlton Cumber, Defendant-appellant, 952 F.2d 397 (4th Cir. 1991)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 952 F.2d 397 (4th Cir. 1991) Submitted Dec. 5, 1991. Decided Dec. 26, 1991

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. (CR-88-26-2-7, CA-91-52-7), W. Earl Britt, District Judge.

Byron Carlton Cumber, appellant pro se.

Robert Daniel Boyce, Thomas P. Swain, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, N.C., for appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:


Byron Carlton Cumber appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Cumber, Nos. CR-88-26-2-7, CA-91-52-7 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 27, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.