Dorothy P. Litzenberg, Plaintiff-appellant, v. John H. Litzenberg, Defendant-appellee,andmichael Birch, Defendant.dorothy P. Litzenberg, Plaintiff-appellant, v. John H. Litzenberg, Defendant-appellee, 952 F.2d 396 (4th Cir. 1991)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 952 F.2d 396 (4th Cir. 1991) Submitted Dec. 5, 1991. Decided Dec. 26, 1991

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. (CA-91-2051-R, CA-91-2270-R), Norman P. Ramsey, District Judge.

Dorothy P. Litzenberg, appellant pro se.

D. Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:


Dorothy P. Litzenberg appeals from the district court's orders dismissing her two civil complaints pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.*  Litzenberg v. Litzenberg, Nos. CA-91-2051-R, CA-91-2270-R (D. Md. Aug. 15, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

 *

We deny Litzenberg's motions for oral argument and to appoint counsel for her