Nathaniel Lewis Howard, Jr., Plaintiff-appellant, v. David A. Williams, Warden, Defendant-appellee.nathaniel Lewis Howard, Jr., Plaintiff-appellant, v. David A. Williams, Warden, Defendant-appellee, 952 F.2d 395 (4th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseAppeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. (CA-90-147-AM, CA-90-125-AM), James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge.
Nathaniel Lewis Howard, Jr., appellant pro se.
Jeanette Dian Rogers, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellee.
E.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, K.K. HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel Lewis Howard appeals from the district court's orders denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988).* Our review of the records and the district court's opinion discloses that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Howard v. Williams, No. CA-90-147-AM, CA-90-125-AM (E.D. Va. June 4, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
These cases were consolidated on appeal
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
