Nathaniel Lewis Howard, Jr., Plaintiff-appellant, v. David A. Williams, Warden, Defendant-appellee.nathaniel Lewis Howard, Jr., Plaintiff-appellant, v. David A. Williams, Warden, Defendant-appellee, 952 F.2d 395 (4th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 952 F.2d 395 (4th Cir. 1992) Submitted Oct. 17, 1991. Decided Jan. 2, 1992

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. (CA-90-147-AM, CA-90-125-AM), James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge.

Nathaniel Lewis Howard, Jr., appellant pro se.

Jeanette Dian Rogers, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellee.

E.D. Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, K.K. HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:


Nathaniel Lewis Howard appeals from the district court's orders denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988).*  Our review of the records and the district court's opinion discloses that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Howard v. Williams, No. CA-90-147-AM, CA-90-125-AM (E.D. Va. June 4, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

 *

These cases were consolidated on appeal