56 Fair Empl.prac.cas. (bna) 1688,57 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 41,041kenneth G. Hicks, Appellee/cross-appellant, v. Brown Group, Inc., D/b/a Brown Shoe Company, Inc.,appellant/cross-appellee, 946 F.2d 1344 (8th Cir. 1991)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit - 946 F.2d 1344 (8th Cir. 1991) Oct. 9, 1991

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Before McMILLIAN and FAGG, Circuit Judges, and HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge.


ORDER

On March 18, 1991, the United States Supreme Court vacated the judgment of this court in the present case and remanded the case to this court for further consideration in light of this court's en banc opinion to be filed in Taggart v. Jefferson County Child Support Enforcement Unit, 915 F.2d 396 (8th Cir.) (Taggart), reh'g en banc granted, 934 F.2d 1414 (1990). Brown Group, Inc. v. Hicks, --- U.S. ----, 111 S. Ct. 1299, 113 L. Ed. 2d 234 (1991).

On June 6, 1991, this court filed its en banc opinion in Taggart holding that, after the Supreme Court's decision in Patterson v. McLean Credit Union, 491 U.S. 164, 109 S. Ct. 2363, 105 L. Ed. 2d 132 (1989), discriminatory discharge claims are not actionable under 42 U.S.C. § 1981. 935 F.2d 947, 948 (8th Cir. 1991). The mandate in Taggart was issued in August 1991.

Pursuant to the directions of the Supreme Court, we have reconsidered our opinion in light of this court's en banc opinion in Taggart. Accordingly, we now reverse the judgment of the district court and remand the case to the district court with directions to dismiss the complaint with prejudice.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.